Gore's response to court ruling

I was interested to find on a Greenpeace blog a report of Al Gore's response to the court ruling re use of 'Inconvenient Truth' in schools (extract below). It goes some way to address my question already raised on this blog about whose purpose the court case served.

"From the start, this court case has reminded me of the "intelligent design" lawsuits in the US. The whole point of the climate change denying camp is to create a false sense of debate, when (in fact) the science on global warming is painfully clear. They've done a pretty good job of this - delaying real action for years - but we can't afford to let them keep doing it."